The hereditary representation of an integer

, also known as the complete base

representation [2], represents

as a sum of powers of a base

, followed by expressing each of the exponents as a sum of powers of

, etc., until the process stops. The change-of-base function

takes a natural number

and changes the base

to

in the complete base

representation of

(see [2]).
Example 1: The complete base 2 representation of 266 is

.
Example 2:

.
The Goodstein sequence [2,5] for

,

, is defined by

, where

and

and

.
Example 3:

is 3,3,3,2,1,0,0,0,…
The Goodstein function [2]

is defined as the smallest index

for which

. Hence

measures the effective length of

, that is,

is the number of terms needed to reach 0 in the sequence

.
Example 4:

.
The explosive growth of
GF can be seen by taking

:

. Compare this to the Shannon number

, a lower bound for the number of possible chess games, or with the estimated number of elementary particles in the universe,

(see [2]). The number of digits of

is larger than the value

. Eventually,
GF dominates every recursive function that
PA can prove to be total. The Löb–Wainer [3] and Hardy [4] function hierarchies are used to characterize provable total functions in
PA. The Hardy hierarchy of fast-growing recursive functions

is indexed by transfinite ordinals

and generalizes the Ackermann function, which occurs (in a slight variant) as

(see [4] for more details). The Löb–Wainer fast-growing hierarchy of recursive functions

is indexed by transfinite ordinals

as well (see [3] for more details). Here

denotes the first ordinal

solving Cantor's equation

.
Now, let

denote the change-of-base function replacing each

by the ordinal

in the complete base

representation of

.
Example 5:

.
Chichon [1] showed that

.
Caicedo [2] showed that for

with

and

, one can write GF in terms of the Löb–Wainer functions as follows:
Hence GF eventually dominates every Hardy and Löb–Wainer function and therefore is not provably total in PA. Hence, the Goodstein theorem is a
true but
unprovable statement in PA and one of the prime examples of a natural independence phenomenon.
[1] E. A. Chichon, "A Short Proof of Two Recently Discovered Independence Results Using Recursion Theoretic Methods,"
Proc. of the AMS,
87(4), 1983 pp. 704–706.
[2] A. E. Caicedo, "Goodstein's Function,"
Rev. Col. de Matemáticas,
41(2), 2007 pp. 381–391.
[3] M. H. Löb and S. S. Wainer, "Hierarchies of Number Theoretic Functions I, II: A Correction,"
Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforschung 14, 1970 pp. 198–199.
[4] G. H. Hardy, "A Theorem Concerning the Infinite Cardinal Numbers,"
Quarterly J. of Mathematics 35, 1904.
[5] R. Goodstein, "On the Restricted Ordinal Theorem,"
J. of Symbolic Logic,
9(2), 1944 pp. 33–41.