Tail Conditional Expectations
![]() This Demonstration was influenced in part by Dr. Gordon Woo's article "Natural Catastrophe Probable Maximum Loss," British Actuarial Journal, 8(5), 2002 pp. 943–959. Snapshot 1: If the "damage" random variable is drawn from certain generalized Pareto distributions, the tail conditional expectation can be three times larger than the exceedance value. Snapshot 2: If the "damage" random variable is drawn from certain Weibull distributions, the tail conditional expectation is not much larger than the exceedance value. Snapshot 3: A model in which damage is a random variable drawn from a gamma distribution. The tail conditional expectation, though of course larger than the exceedance value, does not hugely exceed the exceedance value. It becomes apparent from the Demonstration that the tail conditional expectation is quite sensitive to the particular family of distributions from which the random variable is drawn. Since it is often difficult from data alone to decide which family of distributions should be used, beliefs about tail conditional expectations can vary greatly and can probably be refined only by an understanding of the physical processes behind the distributions. This sensitivity to assumptions can make it difficult to resolve debates about the appropriate premiums to compensate for the risks assumed by private or governmental excess insurers. ![]() "Tail Conditional Expectations" from The Wolfram Demonstrations Project http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/TailConditionalExpectations/ Contributed by: Seth J. Chandler | ||||||||||||||
![]() | ||
|
|
||















Browse all topics















